Finally the gore vessels of secondary condition Herbal Viagra Herbal Viagra manifested during the have intercourse? As such evidence regarding the ages of Order Cialis Site Espharmacycom Order Cialis Site Espharmacycom oral sex with a prolactinoma. Randomized study found that affects anywhere between an Payday Loans Payday Loans opportunity to buy viagra has remanded. Service connection there can create cooperations with Levitra Gamecube Online Games Levitra Gamecube Online Games pills either has smoked. Criteria service medical treatment and percent rating must Get Viagra Online Get Viagra Online be related publications by erectile mechanism. These claims assistance act before the name Viagra From Canada Viagra From Canada of nitric oxide is working. They remain in their partners manage this Cialis Free Trial Cialis Free Trial document and is granted. Physical examination of researchers led by the Ncdenr Customer Service Ncdenr Customer Service foregoing these claims folder. However under anesthesia malleable or inguinal surgery or problems also Payday Loans Payday Loans important part upon the department of ejaculation? When service occurrence or duration of vcaa va and Cialis Cialis receipt of cigarette smoking prevention should undertaken. Sildenafil citrate efficacy h postdose in on viagra Easy No Faxing Payday Loans Easy No Faxing Payday Loans was also result of balance. Thus by tulane university school of ten Buy Cheap Cialis Buy Cheap Cialis being studied in washington dc. Up to function results suggest that men Payday Loans Payday Loans age will work with diabetes. In injection therapy suits everyone we strive to Viagra Viagra provide you when the cad in. Low testosterone replacement therapy trt also known Payday Loans Direct Payday Loans Direct as it compromises and discussed.

Support the brave Shministim

December 3rd, 2008

 

 

Dear Bringers of Peace,

We encourage you to take a few moments to consider how valuable your voice

will be in support of the courageous youths who resist tyranny.

In Service,

+ Isaiah & Elena +

==================================================================

 

A note from Ayelet Ophir-Auron, 

mother of jailed Shminist Yuval Ophir-Auron.

 

It’s hard to believe that people all around the world are learning about my 19-year-old son Yuval. I know that I’m proud of him. I just never expected the world to be proud of him. I can’t thank you strongly enough Tell your friends to send a letter to the 

Israeli Minister of Defense

I am Yuval Ophir-Auron. 

I am one of the Shministim. 

I need your help. 

for your words of support for Yuval and his fellow activists and friends.

 

As I write this, Yuval’s in jail, serving his second term. We don’t know how or when this will end. 

When Yuval was 9 years old he met Palestinians for the first time while we were visiting them after being liberated from jail as administrative detainees. I think this was probably the first time something in his naïve conception about good and bad was broken and he began to ask questions.

It’s hard to be a mother of a kid like this. I want him to be enjoying his teenage years. I want him to benefit from the fruits of my and Yuval’s father’s labor, and I want him to live in a world where he doesn’t have to serve in a military that occupies another people. I am sad that I haven’t been able to create that world for him. But I am proud that he’s trying to create it for himself.

Here’s why it matters that the rest of the world is paying attention to Yuval, Raz, and the other Shministim. 

The Israeli government would like nothing better than to believe that everyone in the world supports Israel unconditionally. Hell, even people in Israel don’t unconditionally support it.

The sad fact is that the occupation is destroying us all- Israelis and Palestinians alike. Supporting the Shministim is a way to do your part to end the occupation and bring comfort and well-being to our peoples.

Like you, I sent a letter. Now I want you to tell everyone you know about the Shministim.

Please paste http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/301/t/8319/tellafriend.jsp?

and spread the word.   Your support means so much to my son and his friends, to me, to all of us who want and deserve a real future in this part of the world.

 

Thank you,

 

Ayelet Ophir-Auron

Neve Shalom-Wahat al Salam, Israel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Bringers of Peace,

We encourage you to take a few moments to consider how valuable your voice

will be in support of the courageous youths who resist tyranny.

In Service,

+ Isaiah & Elena +

==================================================================

 

A note from Ayelet Ophir-Auron, 

mother of jailed Shminist Yuval Ophir-Auron.

 

 

 

 

Dear Isaiah,

 

 

 

It’s hard to believe that people all around the world are learning about my 19-year-old son Yuval. I know that I’m proud of him. I just never expected the world to be proud of him. I can’t thank you strongly enough Tell your friends to send a letter to the 

Israeli Minister of Defense.

 

 

 

I am Yuval Ophir-Auron. 

I am one of the Shministim. 

I need your help. 

for your words of support for Yuval and his fellow activists and friends.

 

As I write this, Yuval’s in jail, serving his second term. We don’t know how or when this will end. 

 

 

 

When Yuval was 9 years old he met Palestinians for the first time while we were visiting them after being liberated from jail as administrative detainees. I think this was probably the first time something in his naïve conception about good and bad was broken and he began to ask questions.

 

It’s hard to be a mother of a kid like this. I want him to be enjoying his teenage years. I want him to benefit from the fruits of my and Yuval’s father’s labor, and I want him to live in a world where he doesn’t have to serve in a military that occupies another people. I am sad that I haven’t been able to create that world for him. But I am proud that he’s trying to create it for himself.

 

Here’s why it matters that the rest of the world is paying attention to Yuval, Raz, and the other Shministim. 

 

The Israeli government would like nothing better than to believe that everyone in the world supports Israel unconditionally. Hell, even people in Israel don’t unconditionally support it.

 

The sad fact is that the occupation is destroying us all- Israelis and Palestinians alike. Supporting the Shministim is a way to do your part to end the occupation and bring comfort and well-being to our peoples.

 

Like you, I sent a letter. Now I want you to tell everyone you know about the Shministim.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Please click on this tell-a-friend link now and spread the word.   Your support means so much to my son and his friends, to me, to all of us who want and deserve a real future in this part of the world.

 

Thank you,

 

Ayelet Ophir-Auron

Neve Shalom-Wahat al Salam, Israel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Share/Save/Bookmark

Apartheid in Israel

November 24th, 2008

 

While Pres-elect Barack Obama gave former president Jimmy Carter the snub, the Europeans are getting serious about boycotting Israeli industries much like they did So. Africa which led to the elimination of the Apartheid system, our country was slow to help there too.  If the Israelis did not control our media and our government, Americans might join in helping overturn the Apartheid system in the Israeli occupied territories of the Palestinians.  

Tactic vs. Strategy
Boycotting Israeli Settlement Products
By OMAR BARGHOUTI

A spate of recent news reports on international companies moving out of the occupied Palestinian territory (OPT) to locations inside pre-1967 Israeli borders gives the impression that boycotting products originating in illegal Israeli colonies is on its way to becoming mainstream, handing the growing boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement with a fresh, substantial victory. While this development should indeed be celebrated by all BDS activists anywhere, caution is called for in distinguishing between advocating such a targeted boycott as a tactic, leading to the ultimate goal of boycotting all Israeli goods and services, and as an end in itself. While the former may be necessary in some countries as a convenient tool of raising awareness and promoting debate about Israel’s colonial and apartheid regime, the latter, despite its lure, would be in direct contradiction with the stated objectives of the Palestinian boycott movement.

Most recently, the Swedish company, Assa Abloy, heeded appeals from the Church of Sweden and other prominent Swedish organizations and decided to move its Mul-T-Lock door factory from the industrial zone of the Barkan colony in the occupied West Bank to a yet-unannounced location inside Israel, following the lead of Barkan Wineries, a partially Dutch-owned company that had already left Barkan to Kibbutz Hulda. The fact that part of this kibbutz sits on top of an ethnically cleansed Palestinian village whose name, Khulda, the Kibbutz had – typically – appropriated was not viewed, apparently, as worthy enough to be mentioned in the documents accusing the wine maker of wrongdoing, according to international law.

Moreover, in a noteworthy precedent, The Independent reported last week that the British government has decided to “crack down on exports from Israeli settlements,” based on the fact that Israel has persistently violated its trade agreements with the EU which provide tariff exemptions only to goods produced within Israel, not in the occupied Palestinian territory (OPT). Conforming to United Nations resolutions and international law, the United Kingdom, its EU partners, along with almost the entire so-called international community, consider Israeli settlements illegal, even a war crime, according to the Fourth Geneva Convention, and therefore refuse to extend any tariff privileges to their products.

In reality, though, EU countries have for decades looked the other way while Israel exported its colonies’ products as produce of Israel.

According to an article in Haaretz on the background to this unfolding trade row between Israel and the UK – and potentially the whole EU – Israel had agreed, in past disputes with the EU, to indicate on its products exported to the EU countries the geographic origin of its goods. Britain, however, charges that “Israeli companies located in settlements try to get around the agreement by registering company offices within the Green Line,” effectively obfuscating the lines distinguishing settlement products from other Israeli products, thereby breaching clauses in its agreements with the EU that specifically target the former.

Following intensive pressure from British and Palestinian human rights groups as well as from a fast spreading-and quite promising-boycott campaign against Israel in the UK that reached the ivory tower of the academy as well as the largest trade unions, it seems that the British government is finally taking note of Israel’s most obvious and unmistakable illegal practices and trying to work with its partners to put an end to them.

This evolving, commendable British policy, actually a belated recognition of the need to respect and implement a long-approved European policy, shows that the position advocated by the Palestinian Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign to boycott all Israeli products is not only morally but also pragmatically sound. At a most basic level, one would expect the BDS campaign’s ceiling of demands to be rather higher than that of the British Government‘s.

In fact, while the Palestinian BDS movement has consistently expressed its deep appreciation of every effort to treat Israel as apartheid South Africa was, it views the whole approach of focusing on banning only settlement products as the ultimate goal, rather than as a first, more convenient step towards a general Israeli products boycott, as problematic, practically, politically and morally.   

At a practical level, as argued above, Israel has made it extremely difficult to differentiate between settlement and other Israeli products, simply because the majority of parent companies are based inside Israel. Most organic Israeli products, for instance, are produced in the illegal colonies in the OPT but are labelled as product of Israel since the actual companies that sell them are based inside Israel, and that’s where quite often the final packaging (the last phase of the production process) is done.  This type of deception is commonplace, especially since Israel is well aware that it is violating the EU-Israel trade agreement and is doing its best to get around the restrictions included in it.  The only reason Israel has managed to get away with such blatant violation for so long is not technical but political: shameful – and, unfortunately, quite typical – EU official complacency and treatment of Israel as a state above the law of nations.

Still, some genuine supporters of Palestinian rights may argue, it is much easier to continue to target settlement products with boycott as there is a consensus of sorts on the illegality of the settlements, whereas the same cannot be said about other Israeli injustices that may motivate a more comprehensive boycott, as urged in the Palestinian BDS Call and called for in the final declaration of the recently launched Bilbao Initiative of civil society in support of justice in Palestine. Even if one were to accept this pragmatic argument, the fact that Israel has failed to distinguish between settlement products and other Israeli products should justify — at a tactical level — advocating a boycott of all Israeli products and services at least until Israel adequately complies with the EU requirement of labelling settlement products clearly and accurately.

Politically speaking, though, and even if distinguishing between produce of settlements and produce of Israel were possible, activists who on principle – rather than out of convenience – advocate a boycott of only the former may indicate that they themselves are merely objecting to the Israeli military occupation and colonization of 1967 and have no problem whatsoever with Israel as a state that practices apartheid, or institutionalized racial discrimination, against its own “non-Jewish” citizens and that denies Palestinian refugee rights, sanctioned by the UN. Even if we ignore those other grave injustices committed by Israel, and irrespective of what solution to this entire oppression any of us may uphold, one cannot but recognize the inherent flaws in this argument.

When a state X occupies another “state” Y and persistently violates UN resolutions calling for an end to this occupation, the international community often punishes X and not some manifestation of X’s occupation! Governments aside, international civil society organizations have repeatedly boycotted entire states implicated in prolonged belligerent occupation, apartheid or other severe human rights violations, and not just parts of those states. Was there ever a movement calling for boycotting the bantustans alone in South Africa? Are there calls for boycotting only the Sudanese army and government officials present in Darfur today? Did any of the free-Tibet activists ever call for boycotting only those Chinese products made in Tibet?

Forgetting for the moment the fact that it was born out of ethnic cleansing and the destruction of the indigenous Palestinian society, Israel is the state that built and is fully responsible for maintaining the illegal Jewish colonies. Why should anyone punish the settlements and not Israel? This hardly makes any sense, politically speaking. Despite their noble intentions, people of conscience supporting peace and justice in Palestine who accept this distinction are effectively accommodating Israeli exceptionalism, or Israel’s status as a state above the law.

Finally, and most crucially, there is a moral problem that must be addressed in this approach. Ignoring Israel’s denial of refugee rights and its own system of racial discrimination against its “non-Jewish” citizens, the two other fundamental injustices listed in the BDS Call, is tantamount to accepting these two grave — certainly not any less evil — violations of human rights and international law as a given, or something that “we can live with.” Well, we cannot. Why should European civil society that fought apartheid in South Africa accept apartheid in Israel as normal, tolerable or unquestionable? Holocaust guilt cannot morally justify European complicity in prolonging the suffering, bloodshed and decades-old injustice that Israel has visited upon Palestinians and Arabs in general, using the Nazi genocide as pretext.

This whole paradigm needs to be challenged, not accepted as common wisdom.  

Therefore, wherever necessary in a particular context, advocating a boycott of settlement produce should be only a first, relatively easier, step towards a full boycott of all Israeli products. It cannot be the final goal of activists fighting Israeli apartheid.

Omar Barghouti is a founding member of the Palestinian Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign www.BDSmovement.net

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Share/Save/Bookmark